* Occupancy rates of retail properties (urban) and retail properties (suburban)
have been disclosed since the end of July, 2010.
| |
|
Retail Properties |
Office |
Total |
| Urban |
Suburban |
Total |
January,
2011 |
Total Leasable Area(m2) |
23,972.32 |
115,258.67 |
139,230.99 |
102,672.87 |
241,903.86 |
| Total Leased Area(m2) |
22,975.91 |
115,258.67 |
138,234.58 |
94,757.91 |
232,992.49 |
| Occupancy Rate(%) |
95.8 |
100 |
99.3 |
92.3 |
96.3 |
| Number of Properties |
7 |
4 |
11 |
14 |
25 |
| Number of Tenants |
40 |
4 |
44 |
117 |
161 |
December,
2010 |
Total Leasable Area(m2) |
23,972.32 |
115,258.67 |
139,230.99 |
102,672.87 |
241,903.86 |
| Total Leased Area(m2) |
22,975.91 |
115,258.67 |
138,234.58 |
98,499.05 |
236,733.63 |
| Occupancy Rate(%) |
95.8 |
100 |
99.3 |
95.9 |
97.9 |
| Number of Properties |
7 |
4 |
11 |
14 |
25 |
| Number of Tenants |
40 |
4 |
44 |
118 |
162 |
November,
2010 |
Total Leasable Area(m2) |
23,972.32 |
115,258.67 |
139,230.99 |
102,679.62 |
241,910.61 |
| Total Leased Area(m2) |
22,503.76 |
115,258.67 |
137,762.43 |
98,486.07 |
236,248.50 |
| Occupancy Rate(%) |
93.9 |
100 |
98.9 |
95.9 |
97.7 |
| Number of Properties |
7 |
4 |
11 |
14 |
25 |
| Number of Tenants |
38 |
4 |
42 |
118 |
160 |
October,
2010 |
Total Leasable Area(m2) |
23,972.32 |
115,258.67 |
139,230.99 |
102,679.62 |
241,910.61 |
| Total Leased Area(m2) |
22,503.76 |
115,258.67 |
137,762.43 |
97,965.61 |
235,728.04 |
| Occupancy Rate(%) |
93.9 |
100 |
98.9 |
95.4 |
97.4 |
| Number of Properties |
7 |
4 |
11 |
14 |
25 |
| Number of Tenants |
38 |
4 |
42 |
117 |
159 |
September,
2010 |
Total Leasable Area(m2) |
23,972.32 |
115,258.67 |
139,230.99 |
92,260.40 |
231,491.39 |
| Total Leased Area(m2) |
22,503.76 |
115,258.67 |
137,762.43 |
87,501.84 |
225,264.27 |
| Occupancy Rate(%) |
93.9 |
100 |
98.9 |
94.8 |
97.3 |
| Number of Properties |
7 |
4 |
11 |
12 |
23 |
| Number of Tenants |
38 |
4 |
42 |
108 |
150 |
August,
2010 |
Total Leasable Area(m2) |
23,972.32 |
115,258.67 |
139,230.99 |
92,237.58 |
231,468.57 |
| Total Leased Area(m2) |
21,292.95 |
115,258.67 |
136,551.62 |
87,479.02 |
224,030.64 |
| Occupancy Rate(%) |
88.8 |
100 |
98.1 |
94.8 |
96.8 |
| Number of Properties |
7 |
4 |
11 |
12 |
23 |
| Number of Tenants |
36 |
4 |
40 |
108 |
148 |
July,
2010 |
Total Leasable Area(m2) |
23,972.32 |
115,258.67 |
139,230.99 |
92,237.58 |
231,468.57 |
| Total Leased Area(m2) |
21,292.95 |
115,258.67 |
136,551.62 |
87,614.31 |
224,165.93 |
| Occupancy Rate(%) |
88.8 |
100 |
98.1 |
95.0 |
96.8 |
| Number of Properties |
7 |
4 |
11 |
12 |
23 |
| Number of Tenants |
36 |
4 |
40 |
109 |
149 |
| |
|
Retail Properties |
Office |
Total |
June,
2010 |
Total Leasable Area(m2) |
139,230.99 |
92,237.58 |
231,468.57 |
| Total Leased Area(m2) |
137,635.59 |
87,614.31 |
225,249.90 |
| Occupancy Rate(%) |
98.9 |
95.0 |
97.3 |
| Number of Properties |
11 |
12 |
23 |
| Number of Tenants |
41 |
109 |
150 |
May,
2010 |
Total Leasable Area(m2) |
139,230.99 |
92,237.58 |
231,468.57 |
| Total Leased Area(m2) |
137,635.59 |
86,583.87 |
224,219.46 |
| Occupancy Rate(%) |
98.9 |
93.9 |
96.9 |
| Number of Properties |
11 |
12 |
23 |
| Number of Tenants |
41 |
107 |
148 |
April,
2010 |
Total Leasable Area(m2) |
139,230.99 |
92,237.58 |
231,468.57 |
| Total Leased Area(m2) |
137,635.59 |
87,143.42 |
224,779.01 |
| Occupancy Rate(%) |
98.9 |
94.5 |
97.1 |
| Number of Properties |
11 |
12 |
23 |
| Number of Tenants |
41 |
109 |
150 |
March,
2010 |
Total Leasable Area(m2) |
139,272.13 |
92,228.28 |
231,500.41 |
| Total Leased Area(m2) |
137,765.14 |
86,383.65 |
224,148.79 |
| Occupancy Rate(%) |
98.9 |
93.7 |
96.8 |
| Number of Properties |
11 |
12 |
23 |
| Number of Tenants |
43 |
108 |
151 |
February,
2010 |
Total Leasable Area(m2) |
139,272.13 |
80,681.57 |
219,953.70 |
| Total Leased Area(m2) |
137,759.92 |
74,836.94 |
212,596.86 |
| Occupancy Rate(%) |
98.9 |
92.8 |
96.7 |
| Number of Properties |
11 |
10 |
21 |
| Number of Tenants |
43 |
94 |
137 |
|
The browser of Macromedia Co. Flash Player is needed for the contents inspection.